Accepting that nobody is doing it willfully or maliciously, it needs to be pointed out that a great deal of
liberty is being taken with the
interpretation of what happened
OOC (and which no one bothered to clarify/discuss after).
Selena Woland
http://nwod.org/forum/showthread.php?37220-Freehold-Leadership
1. The HFiC analog was made to Prince or Hierarch, each of whom can appoint and dismiss Sheriffs and Sentinels at will.
HFiC can absolutely dismiss the Groundskeeper.
2. There was never an IC "election", so
claiming that anyone was appointed by election is false. While it may be a logical assumption, its one probably based on the fact we had an
OOC vote -- but a vote that was never suggested or meant to mimic an IC one.
If these things had been discussed/agreed upon, that would have been fine, but you can't simply paint OOC circumstances in whatever colors suit your fancy or create fictitious elections.
Please don't read this as me taking sides or trying to influence the outcome of this thread -- this is simply a correction of IC misrepresentation of OOC.